The Mediterranean Crossroads Transit Migration, Containment Policies, and Human Rights in Libya and Tunisia
Main Article Content
Abstract
North Africa, and Libya and Tunisia in particular, have emerged over the past two decades as the principal transit zones for migrants and asylum seekers attempting to reach Europe across the Mediterranean Sea. What was once primarily a region of emigration has been fundamentally transformed by European Union externalization policies into a space of migration containment, where the rights, dignity, and lives of transit migrants are routinely subordinated to the imperatives of European border management. This article undertakes a critical political and legal analysis of the transit migration landscape in Libya and Tunisia, examining how EU-funded bilateral cooperation agreements, border surveillance operations, and detention infrastructure have produced a humanitarian crisis of staggering proportions while failing to produce the migration reductions they promise. Drawing on documentary analysis of EU-Libyan and EU-Tunisian cooperation agreements, field interviews with forty-eight transit migrants, sixteen civil society representatives, and nine government officials conducted between 2021 and 2022, and a systematic review of human rights reporting from UNHCR, IOM, and Amnesty International, the study finds that externalization policies have displaced rather than resolved migration, pushed migrants into increasingly dangerous and clandestine routes, and empowered abusive actors — including militia groups in Libya and security forces in Tunisia — as proxies of European border control. The article argues that the current framework is legally indefensible under international human rights and refugee law and proposes a rights-centered alternative built on safe legal pathways, robust asylum systems in transit countries, and shared responsibility mechanisms between the EU and North African states. The findings contribute to critical border studies, the political economy of migration management, and debates on the extraterritorial application of human rights obligations.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
References
Andersson, R. (2014). Illegality, Inc.: Clandestine migration and the business of bordering Europe. University of California Press.
Asylum Information Database. (2022). The implementation of the EU-Turkey statement: A critical assessment. European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
Bialasiewicz, L. (2012). Off-shoring and out-sourcing the borders of EUrope: Libya and EU border work in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics, 17(4), 843–866.
Cuttitta, P. (2018). Delocalization, humanitarianism, and human rights: The Mediterranean border between exclusion and inclusion. Antipode, 50(3), 783–803.
De Genova, N. (Ed.). (2017). The borders of "Europe": Autonomy of migration, tactics of bordering. Duke University Press.
Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2011). Access to asylum: International refugee law and the globalisation of migration control. Cambridge University Press.
Hyndman, J., & Mountz, A. (2008). Another brick in the wall? Neo-refoulement and the externalization of asylum by Australia and Europe. Government and Opposition, 43(2), 249–269.
Lutterbeck, D. (2009). Migrants, weapons and war: The role of military in immigration enforcement. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 28(4), 298–324.
Médecins Sans Frontières. (2021). Libya: A decade of EU-supported human rights violations. MSF International.
Moreno-Lax, V. (2017). Accessing asylum in Europe: Extraterritorial border controls and refugee rights under EU law. Oxford University Press.
Paoletti, E. (2010). The migration of power and north–south inequalities: The case of Italy and Libya. Palgrave Macmillan.
Toaldo, M. (2015). Migration through and from Libya: A Mediterranean challenge. Policy Brief, European Council on Foreign Relations.
UNHCR. (2022). Desperate journeys: Refugees and migrants arriving in Europe and at Europe's borders. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.